🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a disagreement between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their future often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities pays for the expense of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are highly cognitive animals – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed building relationships of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the details and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with different temperaments.

“Eve selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I view relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her relationship with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her three years at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not open to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … receive far higher quality medical attention and constant attention than any individual in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in the spring following the death of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “significant staff”, trucks and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports demands for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual situation in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an export that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s statements indicate a broader misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A proposed refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has been highly debated. The prospective facility, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain optimistic that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a refuge reflects a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a workable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the mental engagement and diet the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|