The Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: How Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants live in homes only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two communities in the town of Grimsby, blocking off roads and walkways that once connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Analysis of official statistics shows how deep disparity can run, at times over little more than a few metres of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of councils now contain a locality ranking as one of the most deprived in the nation.
This spread of poverty has led to a sharp increase in the quantity of places where deprived and well-off residents end up as immediate neighbours. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the most deprived neighbourhoods bordered one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space
In Grimsby, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and painfully apparent. The barrier is much more than a metaphorical division; it creates very real difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take a quarter of an hour turn into an sixty-minute journey.
- Access to important services like supermarkets, educational facilities and employment centres is made more difficult.
- The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“People strive to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the rusted metal wall.
Local Bonds Amidst Hardship
At Centre4, staff stress that need does not recognise addresses. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” explained director a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a strong sense and feeling of community among its residents. Meanwhile, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This phenomenon is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the early 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and living environment.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said a long-term resident, 63. “It’s likely a lot of people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic gap is clear: an typical three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side comparable properties go for about £410,000.
Locals speak of a tangible sense of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” stated resident Susan. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a portrait of an ever more divided society, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.